A Fish Called Wanda is certainly a very funny movie, but why? Well, I've never been a big fan of dissecting comedies, but if I'm going to keep this blog going at such a high rate, then it seems like I'd better get used to it. So here are just a few reasons why this movie really does it for me:
1) It has a surprisingly strong plot for a farce. In fact, as a heist movie, it's not really all that different in spirit than Reservoir Dogs or even Fargo. Why does this matter? Well, a cogent narrative gives all of the ludicrous characters some sort of motive. I love Monty Python sketches as much as the next person, but by the end of Wanda I was laughing much harder than I was in Holy Grail, which feels less than the sum of its parts.
2) It has excellent one-on-one dynamics. If you look at the movie scene-by-scene, all of the best moments occur with exactly two of the four main characters, and the developing relationships give the movie quite a bit of character. The fact that John Cleese gets to behave very differently around Kevin Kline than around Jamie Lee Curtis is a great part of the fun of the movie. (And as good as Kline is in the movie, I do think that Cleese makes the whole thing work. In fact, I think this is Cleese's only great role outside of Monty Python). The only pairing that isn't really explored (outside of one very funny scene) is Cleese and Michael Palin - ironic, considering their history.
3) It's grounded (see part 1), yet much of the humor feels particularly unsafe for a movie of its era. Of course I'm referring to the various pet murdering, but also the fact that Jamie Lee Curtis gets to play such a wonderfully unrepentant seductress. I suppose she does settle down with Cleese in the end, but the ludicrous final title cards take the edge off of that a little bit by making fun of our desire for a happy ending.
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment